Simplifying a lot, Viktor Orbán started well, but then took an undemocratic path. There is truth in this, but I think it is not enough to explain the dramatic change experienced not only by Orbán, but by a whole generation of former liberal anti-communist dissidents in Eastern-Central Europe. We must bear in mind that in the meantime the world around them has also changed: disillusionment with the results of the post-communist transition also explains the growing radicalization of that political class.
Optional service From
But the interpretation of individual pathology is not enough to understand what has happened. That a person who has led the liberal opposition to the communist regime of János Kádár comes to the conclusion that what his country needs is a system that bears some resemblance to that regime seems symptomatic to me. The answer to his question is Japan Mobile Database therefore complex: on the one hand, we must start with him and his personality, on the other, we must make a critical analysis of the post-communist transition in Hungary.
Traffic than the rest of the entire
If we don’t, it is impossible to understand why Orbán, after his return to government in 2010, managed to disintegrate liberal democracy in such a short WS Numbers time to build a new political system. Indeed, what is Hungary today? An authoritarian dictatorship at the heart of the European Union (EU)? In a now-famous 2014 speech, Orbán spoke of illiberal democracy.
